Ethnicity and the use of restrictive practices in mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review

Ethnicity and the use of restrictive practices in mental health inpatient settings: a scoping review

Paper presentation57Martin Locht Pedersen, Forensic Mental Health Research Unit Middelfart, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Van Cappellen ZaalThu 14:00 - 15:30

Aim: To identify and summarise existing knowledge about patient ethnicity and use of restrictive practices in adult mental health inpatient settings. Methodology: A scoping review was conducted using the methodological framework recommended by Arksey and O’Malley (2005), Levac and colleagues (2010) and the JBI (2020). Findings (selected): Altogether 38 studies, mostly European, were included. Ethnicity was mostly divided by migrant/national status in primary studies but not comparable across reviews. Categorising the reported restrictive practices, seclusion was widely reported across studies, followed by multiple concurrent restrictive practices. Significance for practice: Mental health practice needs to focus on patient ethnicity as evidence suggests that some ethnic minorities were more likely to experience restrictive practice than others. Relevance for theme: This review summarises knowledge about ethnicity and use of restrictive practices.

culture and ethnicity), race
Coercive measures, Ethnic disparities, Hospitalised patients, Psychiatry
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.